Horse Clam Hitchhiker

One of the fun things that you can do with your kids at the beach is look for the dramatic siphons of the Horse Clam (Tresus sp.) at low tide. Most people don’t connect the somewhat grotesque looking tube sticking out of the sand with the feeding apparatus of a clam but that is indeed what they are.

Below the surface of the sand, and in the case of Horse Clams up to 50 cm deep, lies a large clam. Rather than trying to dig one of these beasts out, content yourself with studying what you can see – the tip of the siphon or the empty shells of clams on the surface of the sand. It’s just too hard to get the clam back to its original depth once you’ve dug it up.

Fat Gaper (Tresus capax)
The somewhat gross looking siphon of the Fat Gaper (Tresus capax) protruding from the sand.

This weekend we discovered a field of siphons and I encouraged the kids to step close to (but not on!) the siphons. The disturbance of the sand causes the clam to retract its siphon, squirting out a jet of water as it does so. Great fun if someone happens to be taking a close look at the clam’s siphon!

There are two different species of Horse Clams living under the sand at Miracle Beach Provincial Park on Vancouver Island but with some careful observation you can determine which one you’re dealing with. The siphon that I photographed likely belongs to the Fat Gaper (Tresus capax). It differs from the other species, the Pacific Gaper (Tresus nuttallii) in a number of subtle ways.

Fat Gaper (Tresus capax)
A more typical view of the siphon of the Fat Gaper (Tresus capax). Note the organisms growing on the leathery plates at the tip and the golden colour in the inside of the siphon.

According to Andy Lamb’s excellent book Marine Life of the Pacific Northwest, Fat Gapers have finger-like projections on the incurrent opening of the siphon that are gold/tan in colour rather than the dark green that is characteristic of the Pacific Gaper. Note however, that Rick Harbo‚Äôs Shells and Shellfish of the Pacific Northwest states the reverse, describing the rim of the siphon of the Pacific Gaper as tan to pale orange. Kosloff in Seashore Life of The North Pacific, describes the leathery plates as being more prominent on the Pacific Gaper but without having both side by side it is difficult to compare them. Both can have a number of organisms growing on these plates including barnacles, hydroids and red algae.

Pea Crab (Pinnixa sp.) and Fat Gaper (Tresus capax) siphon
A small Pea Crab (Pinnixa sp.) next to the Fat Gaper (Tresus capax) siphon.

Once you’ve found some siphons check them closely for small pea crabs (Pinnixa sp.). These crabs typically live inside the mantle cavity of the clam but can sometimes be found on the surface near the siphon. I discovered a single white crab about the size of my little fingernail near one of the siphons. I’m reasonably sure that this is the Gaper Pea Crab (Pinnixa littoralis) but without a good crab identification book I can’t be 100% certain. The distinguishing feature of this species is the presence of a space between the pincer tips of the claws when they are closed.

Pea Crab (Pinnixa sp.)
A closer look at the pea crab, possibly the Gaper Pea Crab (Pinnixa littoralis).

This was the first time I’ve found a pea crab which reinforces my belief that it’s always important to look closely at the smaller details of things – you’re bound to discover something interesting and wonderful!

Further Reading:

If anyone can provide clarification on the colour of the projections on the siphon I’d appreciate it. I’ll provide a comparison of the two shells of both of these species of horse clams in a future post!

6 comments

  1. Pingback: Island Nature  :: Searching for Sole

  2. Pingback: Island Nature  :: Searching for Sand Dollars

  3. Pingback: Island Nature  :: Saving the Magnificent Pacific Gaper

  4. Hi Dave… I’m working on describing the siphon shows of the horse clams (gapers). The shape, size and color of the siphonal tentacles at the rim of the siphon appear to be different and hopefully consistent.

    You may be able to distinguish the two species from the plates at the tip, T. capax plates slough off, while T. nuttallii have harder, heavier, well formed plates at the tip of the siphon. There are typically more barnacles on the siphon tips of T. nuttallii than T. capax.

    An early study (Swan and Finucane, 1952)reported that T. capax tended to have a brighter and deeper orange in the interior of the siphonal canals. In the muscles surrounding the orange lining, there appeared to be more purplish-blue color in T. nuttallii than capax- I’ve found the opposite to be true. In response, we are photographing siphon shows and harvesting them to confirm the species identification.

    I’ll keep you posted on the findings,
    regards
    Rick Harbo
    Nanaimo,B.C.
    rharbo@shaw.ca

  5. Pingback: Horse Clam Shells

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *